Re: gcov coverage data not full with immediate stop

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gcov coverage data not full with immediate stop
Date: 2020-05-11 20:11:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYADBnjYti+4b=N3CRZz2f3dVfH4Y1gMPCwvGA6jO5q_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:04 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This is the wrong thread to be debating that in, though.

True.

> Also I wonder if this is really RMT turf?

I think it is, but the RMT is permitted -- even encouraged -- to
consider the views of non-RMT members when making its decision.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-11 20:22:40 Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-05-11 20:04:31 Re: gcov coverage data not full with immediate stop