| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
| Date: | 2021-05-03 16:34:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY5dsguxCoVQ-beArcyHRx9vh_hJPoby5VDerLSad86rw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 5:07 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mark Dilger
> <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > After further reflection, no other verbiage seems any better. I'd say go ahead and commit it this way.
>
> OK. I'll plan to do that on Monday, barring objections.
Done now.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-05-03 16:45:16 | Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-05-03 16:25:04 | Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers |