| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Date: | 2014-03-18 13:11:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY5_gA67NE5u3+YZsWsWXcvdUpiGNV+S5Ai0dRk=razDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that
>>> up.
>> The attached patch tighten that up.
> Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat
> grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT.
Meh. There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't
think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2014-03-18 13:12:13 | GSoC proposal. Index-only scans for GIST |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-18 13:09:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make it easy to detach completely from shared memory. |