From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database |
Date: | 2019-01-11 18:40:03 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY4ExqYbhurdi=D-J2ovWD6hkhc0XDH+B1z3FDpYAe+nw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 5:21 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Would it make sense to add a column to pg_stat_database showing the total number of checksum errors that have occurred in a database?
>
> It's really a ">1 means it's bad", but it's a lot easier to monitor that in the statistics views, and given how much a lot of people set their systems out to log, it's far too easy to miss individual checksum matches in the logs.
>
> If we track it at the database level, I don't think the overhead of adding one more counter would be very high either.
It's probably not the idea way to track it. If you have a terabyte or
fifty of data, and you see that you have some checksum failures, good
luck finding the offending blocks.
But I'm tentatively in favor of your proposal anyway, because it's
pretty simple and cheap and might help people, and doing something
noticeably better is probably annoyingly complicated.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-01-11 18:40:49 | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-01-11 18:33:54 | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |