From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Hash Functions |
Date: | 2017-05-13 01:56:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY44haYRLv3cnFw+YtdDx-eLW44LZAjjsvCFFKE8v08fg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:36 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:38:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/12/17 18:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > I think for logical replication the tuple should appear as being in the
>> > parent table, not the partition. No?
>>
>> Logical replication replicates base table to base table. How those
>> tables are tied together into a partitioned table or an inheritance tree
>> is up to the system catalogs on each side.
>
> This seems like a totally reasonable approach to pg_dump, especially
> in light of the fact that logical replication already (and quite
> reasonably) does it this way. Hard work has been done to make
> tuple-routing cheap, and this is one of the payoffs.
Cheap isn't free, though. It's got a double-digit percentage overhead
rather than a large-multiple-of-the-runtime overhead as triggers do,
but people still won't want to pay it unnecessarily, I think.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-13 02:01:28 | Re: multi-column range partition constraint |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-13 01:53:01 | Re: [PATCH v2] Progress command to monitor progression of long running SQL queries |