Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers
Date: 2012-06-28 13:53:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY3kyGQNz6wOO0Sd2Kh3uTLAQ8dkCBQzjgSW2970Qqbdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>  You are inventing problem details to fit
> your solution.

Well, what I'm actually doing is assuming that Josh's customers have
the same problem that our customers do.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-28 13:57:00 Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-06-28 13:51:56 Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers