Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date: 2018-03-19 15:57:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2zRRPtf6wk0WFfKa0+FnmfBKor_c=QcTGcKoyM_jQKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Great. Committed 0001. Are you planning any further testing of this
>> patch series?
>
> Sorry I missed the mail.
> Yes, I have further tested patches and find no more issues.

OK, thanks to both you and Ashutosh Bapat. Committed 0002 and 0003.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-19 16:11:21 Re: Problems with Error Messages wrt Domains, Checks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-19 15:56:43 configure's checks for --enable-tap-tests are insufficient