Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Cc: Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Date: 2012-06-14 17:29:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY21AO8kHWO2kkiQAybKTnxu7XzfV=Kwj0t1R0+9ip23Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Gabriele Bartolini
<gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>    thank you very much for your patience (and thank you Marco for supporting
> me). I apologise for the delay.
>
>    I have retested the updated patch and it works fine with me. It is "ready
> for committer" for me.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-14 17:32:21 Re: Namespace of array of user defined types is confused by the parser in insert?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-06-14 17:29:27 pgsql: New SQL functons pg_backup_in_progress() and pg_backup_start_tim