From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
Date: | 2015-10-13 20:01:52 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY=zk125mOWjrwTkyTJ8VEQ+2_VsPJoTpQRG7fc0rAT-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CommitFest
application. Here is my attempt to summarize the votes upthread:
Tom Lane: plpgsql RAISE is sufficient; we don't need this.
Pavel Stehule: could be replaced by custom function, but not against it.
Robert Haas: plpgsql RAISE is sufficient; we don't need this.
Jim Nasby: A generic wrapper around RAISE is not trivial, so +1.
Andres Freund: I've written this function many times, so let's have it in core.
David Fetter: I've written this function like 20 times, we should have it.
I'm only -0 on this patch, so I won't yell and scream if some other
committer is prepared to step up and get this committed, but I'm not
excited about doing it myself on the strength of a weak consensus in
which I'm not a participant. Any takers? I recommend that we allow
this patch 30 days to attract an interested committer, and, if nobody
volunteers in that time, that we mark it Rejected for lack of
interest.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kolo hhmow | 2015-10-13 20:12:17 | Re: pam auth - add rhost item |
Previous Message | Enrique Escobar | 2015-10-13 19:51:25 | Duda |