Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?
Date: 2014-10-29 16:39:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY=JT6PYFpKNU4q5bZY-DS4TC6+-xxsXhpsjYDupj3ApQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-10-24 11:25:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > What I was thinking was that you'd append the messages to the layer one
>> > level deeper than the parent. Then we'd missed the invalidations when
>> > rolling back the intermediate xact. But since I was quite mistaken
>> > above, this isn't a problem :)
>>
>> So, you happy with the patch now?
>
> Yes.

Great. Committed. Thanks for the review.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-29 16:39:58 Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions
Previous Message Jeremy Harris 2014-10-29 16:38:44 Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions