From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WHERE CURRENT OF with RLS quals that are ctid conditions |
Date: | 2024-05-07 14:05:02 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY+zYEU3JbOfYq6jFvsKsqmO2FPHSqdV7r7R94OjcjrmA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 9:47 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As to whether this is worth fixing, I think it is, but it might not be
> worth back-patching the fix. Also, I'd really like to get disable_cost
> out of the picture here. That would require more code reorganization
> than you've done here, but I think it would be worthwhile. I suppose
> that could also be done as a separate patch, but I wonder if that
> doesn't just amount to changing approximately the same code twice.
>
> Or maybe it doesn't, and this is worth doing on its own. I'm not sure;
> I haven't coded what I have in mind yet.
Never mind all this. I think what I have in mind requires doing what
you did first. So if you're happy with what you've got, I'd go for it.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-07 14:05:16 | Re: WHERE CURRENT OF with RLS quals that are ctid conditions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-07 13:52:49 | Re: pg_restore -N loses extension comment |