| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Date: | 2021-01-28 17:49:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY+wdik9JJL_pqR5jPwoJvgU0PbUtp2Akeos5XiiSppvw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:40 PM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > If I run pg_amcheck --all -j4 do I get a serialization boundary across
> > databases? Like, I have to completely finish db1 before I can go onto
> > db2, even though maybe only one worker is still busy with it?
>
> Yes, you do. That's patterned on reindexdb and vacuumdb.
Sounds lame, but fair enough. We can leave that problem for another day.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-01-28 17:50:51 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-01-28 17:41:33 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |