Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date: 2020-07-31 19:46:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY+tN1not10uMoGxQi8R7jyROQunFxuXx8hVuGsenJbgA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:36 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001 and 0002 are preparatory patches.

I read through these patches a bit but it's really unclear what the
point of them is. I think they need better commit messages, or better
comments, or both.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-31 19:50:04 Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-31 19:43:50 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()