| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Create collation reporting the ICU locale display name |
| Date: | 2019-09-13 15:18:10 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY+cmf49hY+Z4FjonXOXXKdjFt1A3TsyP+Oa+R5qiDyLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That argument presupposes (a) manual execution of the creation query,
> and (b) that the user pays close attention to the NOTICE output.
> Unfortunately, I think our past over-use of notices has trained
> people to ignore them.
Our past overuse aside, it's just easy to ignore chatter. It often
happens to me that I realize 10 minutes after I did something that I
didn't look carefully enough at the output ... which is usually
followed by an attempt to scroll back through my terminal buffer to
find it. But after a few thousand lines of subsequent output that's
hard. So I like the idea of making the information available
on-demand, rather than only at creation time.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Coleman | 2019-09-13 15:31:49 | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-13 15:12:24 | Re: Create collation reporting the ICU locale display name |