From: | pradeep singh <pradeepsingh1988(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: template1 vacuuming consuming much time compared to another production DBs |
Date: | 2013-04-23 01:49:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+TUHZXyomcQpwiD7FabhY3s7XAA69C-Hw4mp_4F77x_DK_ieQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I am using this DB since last 3 or 4 years. And suddenly we can't update it.
We are planning it at the end of year. Recently we faced the template1
wraparound issue. So we added template1 also for vacuuming. We are
vacuuming the DB each hour with 'vacuumdb --analyze -a' options.
Now the vacuuming of template1 consumes time. And the queries become slow.
From the logs i find that during this we period there are lot of backend
processes in startup state. so i think connection open is slow. They are
waiting on WCHAN log_wait_.
So could you please recommend what may be the problem. FYI there is much
load on OS this time.
And why vacuuming of template1 only consumes time not other DBs?
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 04/22/2013 07:31 AM, pradeep singh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I am using postgresql 8.1 DB.
>>
>
> Why are you using a release of Postgres that is way out of date and
> unsupported?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>
--
pradeep singh
biet jhansi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kelphet Xiong | 2013-04-24 23:56:24 | Question about network bandwidth usage between PostgreSQL’s client and server |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-23 00:39:23 | Re: Issues with OSX and SHMMAX? |