Re: [HACKERS] USER Profiles for PostgreSQL

From: chiru r <chirupg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] USER Profiles for PostgreSQL
Date: 2017-09-19 22:32:09
Message-ID: CA+RSxMi5c2P+BY35q=Dyiu3gTaM_UUFF-mY-d=V0yJn--OsyCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi John,

How those application accounts get recognized in database?

Let say App_user1 authenticated through application ,after that how the
App_user1 get access to DB?

can you please provide more information ,how the app users are accessing
database ?

Thanks,
Chiranjeevi

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9/19/2017 12:33 PM, chiru r wrote:
>
>> Yes, LDAP will do. However we need to sync the user accounts and groups
>> between AD and PG servers.and then AD profiles will apply to PG user
>> accounts for authentication.
>>
>>
> if you're using LDAP from the AD servers to authenticate, whats to sync?
>
>
> my database servers, the only 'users' connecting to them directly are the
> database administrators... the applications connect with application
> accounts, and if more security is required, these use certificates, or they
> use unix 'ident' local connections.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2017-09-19 23:07:03 Re: [HACKERS] USER Profiles for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jerry Sievers 2017-09-19 22:00:05 Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-09-19 22:36:01 Re: Show backtrace when tap tests fail
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2017-09-19 22:29:14 Re: [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()