From: | chiru r <chirupg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] USER Profiles for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2017-09-19 22:32:09 |
Message-ID: | CA+RSxMi5c2P+BY35q=Dyiu3gTaM_UUFF-mY-d=V0yJn--OsyCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi John,
How those application accounts get recognized in database?
Let say App_user1 authenticated through application ,after that how the
App_user1 get access to DB?
can you please provide more information ,how the app users are accessing
database ?
Thanks,
Chiranjeevi
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/19/2017 12:33 PM, chiru r wrote:
>
>> Yes, LDAP will do. However we need to sync the user accounts and groups
>> between AD and PG servers.and then AD profiles will apply to PG user
>> accounts for authentication.
>>
>>
> if you're using LDAP from the AD servers to authenticate, whats to sync?
>
>
> my database servers, the only 'users' connecting to them directly are the
> database administrators... the applications connect with application
> accounts, and if more security is required, these use certificates, or they
> use unix 'ident' local connections.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2017-09-19 23:07:03 | Re: [HACKERS] USER Profiles for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Jerry Sievers | 2017-09-19 22:00:05 | Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2017-09-19 22:36:01 | Re: Show backtrace when tap tests fail |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2017-09-19 22:29:14 | Re: [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN() |