Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres

You keep on giving excuses (imperfect world and blah blah) and I will keep
on raising questions on them.

The link you shared could have been shared earlier as well.

But instead of that as usual you and your mates stretched the conversation
without going in any direction so basically you wasted author’s time.

And I have no doubt that you will waste more time of yours as well as of us
by giving some kore excuses.

On Saturday, January 16, 2021, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 1/15/21 8:28 AM, Atul Kumar wrote:
>
>> And basically you are improving your knowledge as you are expecting those
>> questions the answers of which you dont know about.
>>
>> Thats why you seem to not to be helpful and somehow stopping others to
>> not to be helpful.
>>
>> I don’t find find it wrong if any new guy asking the question that has
>> been repeated 1000 times earlier, if I know the answer I WILL RESPOND 1000
>> TIMES, “unlike you”.
>>
>>
> It was for this reason that FAQ's(https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ)
> where created. Also why the mailing list archives are searchable:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/search/?m=1&ln=pgsql-general&q=monitor+tool
>
> Which leads to:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAODZiv7LE+OAwpTyA8G6v
> Bd0gGmRwfrP1X0JXs5wvAuorENxrg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200528091111.mog2nxi
> yuan7xjjy%40office.hexack.fr
>
> The frustration is that with literally a world of information at hand and
> searchable, folks often do not do the basic homework that would answer
> their question in less time then waiting for a response from a list. You
> see it enough times and even the calmest person gets irritated. In a
> perfect world that would not happen, we don't live in a perfect world.
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>