From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: meson "experimental"? |
Date: | 2024-06-04 15:28:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozomuTH=5hWcDcQ-Q+SUVRZXpSoB+CP8Zj3n00kYZX3Vw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 16:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
> wrote:
> > "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> > option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> > For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
>
> Is it, though? I feel like we're beyond the experimental stage now.
>
I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the old
MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I would
have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on Windows
when I realised that change had been made, and having to update builds for
pgAdmin and the Windows installers, I think it's clear it's far more
experimental on that platform than it is on Linux at least.
--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-06-04 15:35:04 | Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Previous Message | Yogesh Sharma | 2024-06-04 15:26:47 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |