Re: meson "experimental"?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson "experimental"?
Date: 2024-06-04 15:28:22
Message-ID: CA+OCxozomuTH=5hWcDcQ-Q+SUVRZXpSoB+CP8Zj3n00kYZX3Vw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 16:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
> wrote:
> > "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> > option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> > For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
>
> Is it, though? I feel like we're beyond the experimental stage now.
>

I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the old
MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I would
have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on Windows
when I realised that change had been made, and having to update builds for
pgAdmin and the Windows installers, I think it's clear it's far more
experimental on that platform than it is on Linux at least.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-06-04 15:35:04 Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Previous Message Yogesh Sharma 2024-06-04 15:26:47 Re: Logical Replication of sequences