From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: missing attachment in mails |
Date: | 2013-07-30 09:11:54 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozhjKadWQZZ2eVonfS1Ez0Pmr-3yfWt5FxLM5vcstJx9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Le lundi 17 juin 2013 23:30:16, Cédric Villemain a écrit :
>> Le lundi 17 juin 2013 15:56:44, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Cédric Villemain
>> >
>> > <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > > Le mercredi 29 mai 2013 19:36:46, Stephen Frost a écrit :
>> > >> * Cédric Villemain (cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> > >> > I've search another example and found one from Stephen Frost (Sign +
>> > >> > attachment):
>> > >> >
>> > >> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130413030619.GN4361@tamriel.s
>> > >> > no wma n.net
>> > >> >
>> > >> > it contains an attachment not visible in the archive.
>> > >>
>> > >> Huh, neat. Yeah, this is the way mutt handles attachments, etc, and
>> > >> is pretty common (at least, among open source folks :). We should
>> > >> probably look into figuring out how to support it..
>> > >
>> > > I had no time to have a look at that.
>> > > CF is on its way but the mails linked from CF items don't contain
>> > > attachment...
>> > >
>> > > How can I help fixing that ?
>> >
>> > A good start would be to identify exactly when this happens. Not based
>> > on which MUA is used, but based on which types of messages. The first
>> > one on your list (the only one i have time to check right this moment
>> > - boarding a flight) is a multipart/signed containing a
>> > multipart/mixed for example - might it be that the problem lies in
>> > nested multipart or so?
>>
>> Correct, issue was that recursion entered only multipart/mixed, I've added
>> multipart/signed. See patch 0001.
>> I've also attached a patch to correct a typo.
>
> would you mind review this patch ?
Magnus is OOO at the moment, and will be for a couple more weeks or so.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-30 17:31:55 | Re: reply-to set |
Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2013-07-30 09:09:49 | Re: missing attachment in mails |