Re: Feature matrix filter

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 30 May 2013 23:12, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 30 May 2013 11:33, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> That should be the case with the "hide unchanged features" checkbox
>>>> checked anyway. The rule is, if it's the same value across all
>>>> displayed versions (regardless of whether they're all "Yes", "No" or
>>>> "Obsolete"), the row becomes hidden.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I get that. I'm just suggesting that obsolete features should be
>>> treated differently, as they're even less interesting than something
>>> that was implemented before the first version show.
>>
>> Well it still seems like an unnecessary complication of yet another
>> checkbox for the sake of 6 affected features. I could add it if you
>> really want it. The rule would be that if any of the displayed
>> versions for a particular feature contain "Obsolete" then the row is
>> hidden.
>>
>>> Regardless of that, I do think that checkbox should be on it's own line. And everything centred to look tidier.
>>
>> Latest version does that.
>>
>> And while we're doing this, would we want to add 7.4 back in? It's in
>> the database anyway, or is it just too old?
>
> So, with 9.4 coming up later this year, the feature matrix will be
> overflowing many screens.
>
> I've rebased the old patch and also included jQuery rather than
> referring to a Google-hosted copy.

Works for me :-)

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company