Re: Search points to ancient manuals

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Search points to ancient manuals
Date: 2012-11-07 16:38:20
Message-ID: CA+OCxoz7xBBSs5GkY+cxRC2tM9-TxEKaFxz-3Rr5F3bts3Qosg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 06:00 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> We already do this for Google, so it shouldn't be rocket science.
>
> I still routinely see 8.1 / 8.2 / 8.3 results in searches. For example, my
> first hit for a Google search for EXPLAIN ANALYZE is

FYI, the Google Analytics traffic flow report shows this nicely.
docs/8.1/static is one of the highest ranked landing pages (depending
on the month - sometimes it's at the top, other times second in the
samples I looked at), and shows large numbers of users bouncing
straight across to the 9.1 docs (25% in October) or the 9.2 docs (20%
in October).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-11-07 17:49:01 Re: [PATCH] Enable CsrfViewMiddleware -- make CSRF protection required by default
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2012-11-07 14:52:58 [Fwd: [BUGS] Bug reporting form :-(]