Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:37, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:29, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
> wrote:
> >> >>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the
> funds group
> >> >>> policy document on the website. The first para on the page
> explains Core
> >> >>> Team
> >> >>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
> >> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
> >> >>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
> >> >> +1 from me
> >> >
> >> > -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
> >> > modify it.
> >>
> >> Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which
> should be
> >> changed at some point? Right now it implies that the Funds group
> reports to
> >> the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group,
> which
> >> AFAIK isn't correct.
> >
> >
> > Yes, it is. The core team has the power of veto over the Liaison and
> Deputy Liaison.
> >
> > This page is the charter which describes the relationship between the
> project and the funds group, so it makes sense (because others within SPI
> don't know our project) to have all the key details in one place.
>
> Perhaps it should not actually be listed under "general policies"
> then, and instead have a separate heading for charters? I think it's
> the only such page we have, right?
>

At the moment, I believe it is. We should probably add something similar
for PGCA though.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com