From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Manage analytics through tag manager? |
Date: | 2020-07-02 12:25:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxoypnjDEKKqOiCDSJkML5Bhw7DjS5Z+DrnQBG4JxAsYSbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:23 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> > On 2 Jul 2020, at 11:01, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> > ..for what I'm trying to achieve right now it seems like I'm being
>> asked to jump through a 30cm hoop that's being dangled from the top of a 4
>> storey building.
>>
>> To be fair, I think the shape and placement of the hoops would've been
>> different if it was made clear(er) from the start that the proposal was to
>> measure outbound traffic for a *limited period*. At least I didn't
>> understand
>> that until this email.
>>
>
> Sorry, I thought that was clear as I said in my original message that I
> thought the outbound link tracking would be useful for the project I'm
> working on. On re-reading I see that my wording on that was somewhat less
> than awesome.
>
>
>>
>> Settling on the future analytics needs for postgresql.org sounds like a
>> topic
>> well suited for an unconference style discussion, maybe we'll end up
>> changing
>> nothing but it's worth discussing.
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>>
>> What we can do to address concerns with tracking in the meantime is to
>> honor
>> the DoNotTrack header in the site template, and only load GA/GTM in case
>> navigator.doNotTrack isn't set. Something like the (completely untested)
>> attached migth be all we need? The diff also removes the ability to load
>> GA
>> over http, which we clearly shouldn't allow (and since moving the site to
>> all
>> https we don't anyways IIUC).
>>
>
> I think we'd also need to check windows.doNotTrack to cover Microsoft
> browsers, but yes, I think that will work with GA.
>
Err, that should be window.doNotTrack of course.
>
> In GTM you can do it in the config (i.e. through the container settings in
> the management UI). Browsers would still pull the code of course, but then
> any tracking would be disabled.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-07-02 12:33:47 | Re: Manage analytics through tag manager? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2020-07-02 12:23:36 | Re: Manage analytics through tag manager? |