Re: [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue with Node rename

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Harshal Dhumal <harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue with Node rename
Date: 2017-05-15 08:13:37
Message-ID: CA+OCxoyNypmdKPzWmJpOGQgvWJ+YsN0zUpTphfZczYKYkJ-nEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

So is the last patch considered good?

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> Yes, It is existing one only, We did not touch on any part of sorting
> algorithm in this patch.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Murtuza Zabuawala
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Ashesh is out this week. As long as new nodes are sorted with the same
>> algorithm as existing ones, that's fine.
>>
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Harshal,
>>>
>>> We are using https://github.com/javve/natural-sort for sorting nodes
>>> which is implemented by Ashesh.
>>>
>>> @Ashesh,
>>> Any suggestion on this?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Harshal Dhumal <
>>> harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Murtuza,
>>>>
>>>> Currently nodes are sorted in case sensitive manner it should be case
>>>> insensitive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See current Server group order is A, Servers, a1, a​2. It should be A,
>>>> a1, a2, Servers.
>>>> Similarly check sorting order for server and database nodes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Harshal Dhumal*
>>>> *Sr. Software Engineer*
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find updated patch as discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed please find updated patch removing hardcoded check for
>>>>>> server & server-group node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ashesh,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PFA updated patch for the issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ashesh, can you review/commit this please? Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PFA minor patch to fix the issue where node rename is not working
>>>>>>>>>> properly after 7dd9efd8
>>>>>>>>>> <https://redmine.postgresql.org/projects/pgadmin4/repository/revisions/7dd9efd811c7845d9dc985b66f8d33497f2f4bfa> commit
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> RM#2355
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We should remove the existing node, and then insert at right place
>>>>>>>> instead of refreshing the parent.
>>>>>>>> Because - that will select the parent node, and not that node, and
>>>>>>>> also - it adds overhead of refreshing the whole parent node.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please send the patch as per our discussion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Thanks, Ashesh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Murtuza Zabuawala
>>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (
>>>>>>>>>> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>>>>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-05-15 08:27:42 Re: [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue in table node
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2017-05-15 08:11:49 Re: [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue with Node rename