Re: Revamped runtime vs. Version number

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Anthony DeBarros <adebarros(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Revamped runtime vs. Version number
Date: 2018-02-01 15:24:22
Message-ID: CA+OCxoyNA78t6ukorbHKtitnnGbVhHNGVg_xXQKWnh6NJuDoBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgadmin-support

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Anthony DeBarros <adebarros(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> +1 … what roughly would be the release date? (Asking only because my
> beginner SQL book, which uses pgAdmin, is publishing in April and we are in
> the final proofreads now.)
>

Maybe in a couple of weeks. I don't have a specific plan yet though - we've
been working on accessibility features for the last few weeks, and I want
to get them completed which is taking more effort than expected.

>
> Anthony DeBarros
>
>
> On February 1, 2018 at 10:09:46 AM, Paolo Saudin (paolosaudin(at)gmail(dot)com)
> wrote:
>
> As Melvin, I am too in favor of "version number to 3.0 for the next
> release".
>
> Paolo
>
> 2018-02-01 16:00 GMT+01:00 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2018 8:15 PM, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> So there's been nothing but positive feedback about the PoC revamped
>> runtime I asked folks on the lists to test. Thank you to everyone that did
>> so.
>>
>> With that in mind, I think we should use that in the next version and
>> moving forwards, and bump the version number to 3.0 for the next release.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Does anyone object to that plan?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> -- Thanks, Ashesh
>>
>>
>> FYI, since the original PoC, I've made the following additional changes:
>>
>> - Move to using a shared memory interlock to ensure only a single
>> instance (per user, per copy of the executable) is run. This means if you
>> have multiple copies of pgAdmin installed, they won't interact with each
>> other, but a single copy is limited to a single instance per user.
>>
>> - Add a log viewer. If startup fails (or other errors occur), the Python
>> logs can now easily be viewed in the runtime.
>>
>> - Tidied up the configuration dialogue.
>>
>> - Added a config option to allow an alternate command to be run rather
>> than executing the default browser. This allows any browser to be
>> configured, using different profiles etc, as possible when launching on the
>> command line.
>>
>> - Made startup more robust so config options can be corrected without
>> restarts if needed, and failures can be detected much more quickly.
>>
>> - Cleaned up a bunch of redundant code.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2018-02-01 15:27:41 pgAdmin 4 commit: Don't include sizes on primitive datatypes that shoul
Previous Message Anthony DeBarros 2018-02-01 15:21:13 Re: Revamped runtime vs. Version number

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abdul Gaffar Shaikh 2018-02-02 09:45:06 Pgadmin Doubt
Previous Message Anthony DeBarros 2018-02-01 15:21:13 Re: Revamped runtime vs. Version number