| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing support for v1 and v2 protocols? |
| Date: | 2014-06-19 07:49:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoyDqjjDVLK1du=VDgby=F16abSTarXkeGcfs8=mVsa5Bg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm a bit lost as to why psqlODBC does so much of this its self, instead
> of just using libpq. PgJDBC does it because it wants to be a JDBC Type 4
> driver, i.e. all Java code, so it can't talk to libpq over JNI/JNA. That
> concern does not apply to psqlODBC, which in fact already links to libpq
> but doesn't seem to use it for protocol handling.
We tried to port psqlODBC to libpq 5 - 10 years ago. It didn't go
well, and eventually we went back to the original code.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-06-19 08:01:29 | Re: Removing support for v1 and v2 protocols? |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-06-19 06:02:32 | Re: Protocol de-synchronisation bug, bogus query sent |