| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Kris Pennella <kris(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |
| Date: | 2012-11-07 15:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoyD1nCG8XmR0Wdn3t7iDks8Kps=GNyFOQV4DCJ4KYHN1g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> We are fairly restrictive about giving access to that data. You'd have
> to check that with -core.
We've always said no in the past, though we have shared specific
pre-generated reports from time to time.
> Through a quick discussion with Jonathan yesterday it seems the data
> in there isn't actually that correct anyway - it looks like we're
> hitting the limit of what the free tier of google analytics will give
> us, and have been hitting that for quite some time, so we don't really
> know what the numbers are...
Hmm, that would explain a thing or two...
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2012-11-07 15:44:15 | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-11-07 15:26:07 | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |