Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To fix issues in Boolean editor

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To fix issues in Boolean editor
Date: 2017-11-22 16:39:23
Message-ID: CA+OCxoy4sy8ZzsCRKsgqLaOPimj=myf=yGa8tGnru-6BsD2OjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@
> enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> ​Hi Dave,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> PFA updated patch.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HI
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>> murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PFA updated patch with custom tristate boolean editor for SlickGrid
>>>>>> to make it compatible with Qt runtime.
>>>>>> I have tested it web mode & also modified the feature test
>>>>>> accordingly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also thanks to Neel for testing the patch with latest runtime code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool - so a few thoughts...
>>>>>
>>>>> - Can we make the null symbol a question mark?
>>>>>
>>>> ​instead of question mark we will make square
>>>> gray color
>>>> ​.​
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry - I just realised this is not good from an accessibility
>>> perspective as users may not be able to distinguish between the white and
>>> gray in-fill. I've made it include a ? as well.
>>>
>> ​
>> I have enhanced the the visibility of '?'
>> little bit
>> ​more​
>> , attaching the patch if you prefer it that way.
>>
>
> In the call, Dave suggested that, we should have:
> Cross (×, i.e. &#215;) for False
> Check (√, i.e. &#8730;) for True
> Empty (∅, i.e. &#8709;) for Null.
>
> We discussed it, which I think - Murtuza missed due to connectivity
> issue, during the call.
>
> Dave - thoughts?
>

What we have now seems to work nicely, and I believe is quite clear.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-11-22 16:48:40 pgAdmin 4 commit: Honour whitespace properly in the data grid. Fixes #2
Previous Message Dave Page 2017-11-22 16:38:37 Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To fix issues in Boolean editor