| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week |
| Date: | 2011-09-20 14:43:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoy2-5GYvF7VaBd=TOWW6YYpCa8s-9y7J8P2mQXvb6yKPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/9/20 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> 2011/9/20 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>>> On 09/20/2011 10:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> does "after December" really mean "in or after December", or did we
>>>> really mean "after"?
>
>>> If we really want to get that specific, let's just say that the EOL date is
>>> at the end of the designated month.
>
>> +1
>
> OK, so "after" really means "after", ie, the last 8.2.x release will be
> timestamped 2012-something. Fine with me.
It's unfortunate, but it seems to me it's the only interpretation that
doesn't risk taking someone by surprise.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-20 14:53:17 | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-09-20 14:42:14 | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |