Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6460]: Need a mechanism to detect a corrupt/broken config DB file.

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Nikhil Mohite <nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6460]: Need a mechanism to detect a corrupt/broken config DB file.
Date: 2021-06-03 09:19:00
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxyXvuVgCin3SL7cg8eicGjZ1NKFRkhDGPaP=mgLXXPzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:01 AM Nikhil Mohite <
nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:47 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:39 AM Nikhil Mohite <
>> nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> Please find the attached patch for RM-6460
>>> <https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/6460>: Need a mechanism to
>>> detect a corrupt/broken config DB file.
>>>
>>> 1. Added checks if all tables added in the model are present in SQLite
>>> DB or not.
>>> 2. If migrations fail it will backup older file and try migrations with
>>> the newly created file.
>>> (User will get notification on UI for the location of the backup file
>>> and newly created.)
>>> 3. If the user deleted any table from SQLite DB pgAdmin will not run on
>>> the next restart and it will add the missing table list in the logs.
>>>
>>
>> Surely if any tables have been deleted, it'll fail the check in point 1?
>>
> Yes, but if the user deletes any table while pgAdmin is running then it
> will fail when the user tries to run pgAdmin next time.
>

Right - but how is the end result of that different from a failed migration
that left a table missing? Either way, the end result is the same, and
should be handled the same way; i.e. backup/recreate the DB, then warn the
user as soon as the UI is up.

I believe the process is simple (and maybe this is what is done and this is
just a language issue - I haven't read the patch in detail):

- On startup, attempt to create the database/run any migrations as
appropriate.
- Check that all tables exist, and the schema version is correct.
- If there's a problem, backup the file, create a new one from scratch, and
warn the user.

One thing I did notice when skimming the patch - we have this in the code:

+ raise RuntimeError(
+ 'Specified SQLite database file is not valid.')

The *user* didn't specify a SQLite database file (nor do they care that
it's SQLite at this point). That (and any other similar messages) should
probably be rephrased to say something like:

"The configuration database file is not valid."

Thanks!

> (If we remove the table from the model it will not check particular table
> is present in DB or not. )
>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>> Regards,
> Nikhil Mohite.
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Mohite 2021-06-03 09:40:38 Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6460]: Need a mechanism to detect a corrupt/broken config DB file.
Previous Message Nikhil Mohite 2021-06-03 09:01:32 Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6460]: Need a mechanism to detect a corrupt/broken config DB file.