Re: User management functionality patch [pgadmin4]

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Harshal Dhumal <harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User management functionality patch [pgadmin4]
Date: 2016-05-31 09:15:56
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxvvYzHKeF39tJeRNkfgmKBTmntTwrwA1_WGrKfAqv1Lw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;
>>
>> - Why do we need Marshmallow?
>>
>> - Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have
>> shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.
>>
> Hmm..
> He just added one more role - 'Standard'.
> 'Administrator' role was already presents in it.
>

Oh yes, sorry, misread that. 'pgAdmin User Role' would be a better
description though I think.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2016-05-31 09:25:39 PATCH: Minor patch to fix typo in Type node
Previous Message Ashesh Vashi 2016-05-31 08:52:53 Re: User management functionality patch [pgadmin4]