Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog
Date: 2016-03-04 10:38:01
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxiDN=c0nRcLL24zKxnusHk9xkRNTxp-Rb4KOagdyzJ_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

And here's the attachment.

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashesh Vashi
>>> <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Please find the patch adding support for the preferences/options dialog.
>>>> Initial patch was shared by Khushboo with me, but - I made some design
>>>> changes.
>>>>
>>>> With this patch:
>>>> * Each preferences can be saved/retrieved per module basis.
>>>> * An object is created which represent that module in the preferences by
>>>> default.
>>>> * Module needs to override the register_preferences(...) method to
>>>> register certain preference.
>>>> * You can access other modules preference using static methods of the
>>>> preferences.
>>>> * A collection module (PGChildModule) will register
>>>> show_node_<NODE_TYPE>, and also refers the 'show_system_objects' in it,
>>>> which can be accessed using self.pref_show_system_objects, or can use class
>>>> property 'show_system_obejcts', also there is one more property 'show_node',
>>>> which uses the 'pref_show_node' object of that module.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've done an initial review:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> - The patch has bit-rotted, and needs to be rebased.
>>
>> Done.
>>>
>>>
>>> - web/pgadmin/preferences/__init__.py has an out of date copyright notice
>>> with no blank line after it, and no pydoc comment to introduce the file.
>>
>> Done.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see anything else that seems horrendously wrong at the moment,
>>> but will look more closely once the rebase has been done.
>>
>> Please find the updated patch.
>>
>
> Thanks. Is it dependent on any other patches? I'm getting the attached
> message when expanding the server group node (I have the schema/catalog
> patch applied).
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
image/png 21.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2016-03-04 10:49:51 Re: Numeric control optionally allow null values [pgadmin4]
Previous Message Dave Page 2016-03-04 10:36:03 Re: [pgAdmin IV] PATCH: Add support for the notices/messages from the backend server.