| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 15:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxfe+m2x39yoctmtNjhRcF_6w_RxbzGrFbBWgUWyMjvXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Well, one potential issues is that there may be projects which have
> already coded in 9.6 checks for feature support.
I suspect that won't be an issue (I never heard of it being for 7.5,
which was released as 8.0 - but is smattered all over pgAdmin 3 for
example) - largely because in such apps we're almost always checking
for a version greater than or less than x.y.
I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written
assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2016-05-13 15:34:34 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2016-05-13 15:26:05 | Re: 10.0 |