| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages |
| Date: | 2020-11-02 08:53:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxKxibdyy1wc7jP1=DSWK=EVCMWzyaKM+-zGf1JHpJfJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 10/30/20 1:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> The new download pages that generate "copy/paste scripts" include sudo
> >> in the instructions for debian and ubuntu, but not for redhat and
> >> centos. That seems inconsistent :) We should probably be consistent
> >> there, or is there a particular reason not to be?
> >
> > Can't see a reason not to include it on the Red Hat side.
>
> +1. Doing a scan of other projects, it seems to be acceptable to include
> "sudo" as part of providing installation instructions.
>
Does sudo work out of the box on CentOS/RHEL 6? Otherwise I don't see a
problem with it.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2020-11-02 09:09:37 | Re: sudo inconsistencies in download pages |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2020-11-02 00:10:37 | Bugs in new announcement system |