From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 10 documentation URL |
Date: | 2017-05-19 07:49:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxKGh_j4zYC2FNkcmSkoErdqu58TGcsLOXMq5d8KcCZtA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't this
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html
>>
>> rather be
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html
>>
>> ?
>
>
>
> Certainly seems that way to me, given the version number we decided on :)
>
> Dave, was there a particular reasoning behind adding the .0 to the url
> (since you had to hack the regexps anyway)?
I didn't add the .0 - I hacked the regexps to handle 2 digits before the .
There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the
new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will
automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the
generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app
issue).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-05-19 11:37:35 | Re: PG 10 documentation URL |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-05-19 05:54:54 | Re: PG 10 documentation URL |