Re: PG 10 documentation URL

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10 documentation URL
Date: 2017-05-19 07:49:00
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxKGh_j4zYC2FNkcmSkoErdqu58TGcsLOXMq5d8KcCZtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't this
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html
>>
>> rather be
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html
>>
>> ?
>
>
>
> Certainly seems that way to me, given the version number we decided on :)
>
> Dave, was there a particular reasoning behind adding the .0 to the url
> (since you had to hack the regexps anyway)?

I didn't add the .0 - I hacked the regexps to handle 2 digits before the .

There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the
new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will
automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the
generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app
issue).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-05-19 11:37:35 Re: PG 10 documentation URL
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-05-19 05:54:54 Re: PG 10 documentation URL