Re: rc1 or beta4?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date: 2011-08-17 13:09:00
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxFrB0c2Z1SFfjEXdvcm6WxeiLYfBvBWJR82JDCqPLjCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/8/17 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
>
> RC1:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19869.1312298345@sss.pgh.pa.us

In Tom's final email to the -core thread he mentions I see now that he
did say RC1. I thought we were voting on the date though (not that I
have a problem with it being RC1).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-08-17 13:53:08 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-08-17 13:03:29 Re: rc1 or beta4?