From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
Cc: | Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#2989] To fix the issue in Table node |
Date: | 2018-03-07 12:42:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxox3gREiVKvXSh2=OjooseZH3cveT90C97k6mH6s0AYGnA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
> Hi Murtuza,
>
> The code change works, and I passed the patches through our pipeline and
> everything is green.
> Personally I would love this bug fixes to have refactored the function
> into smaller chunk and made it more readable so that the next time someone
> need to check out a problem in the same area it is easier. I understand
> that without a good test coverage it is hard to have confidence while
> refactoring, but we need to start somewhere.
>
Are you planning to look into this Murtuza?
>
> @Hackers
> Here is a video that I saw some time ago about refactoring existing code
> and code complexity that is very interesting
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE
> In this video Sandi Metz does the Gilded Rose Kata in a talk in RailsConf
> 2014, and with it tries to demonstrate that code can be refactored and with
> that it make the code much more simpler. But the journey is not always
> simple and the complexity will increase before it get simpler. It is a good
> example of something that we can try with our code.
>
Nice!
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2018-03-07 12:44:51 | Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#2989] To fix the issue in Table node |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2018-03-07 11:52:18 | Re: [pgadmin4][patch] GreenPlum function statistics through an exception |