From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does pg_settings.sourcefile/sourceline work on Windows? |
Date: | 2011-10-04 19:48:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxox=Df1c0wfUPJ3=RE_=FTD8i4AtrGwsFk_Zz4p+6VFGBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I'm betting not, because I don't see any support for copying their
>>> values down to child processes in
>>> write_nondefault_variables/read_nondefault_variables.
>
>> Correct, it does not.
>
> OK. I can fix that while I'm busy hacking on guc.c. Does anyone care
> enough about this to think it should be back-patched?
I think it's worthwhile if the patch can be applied fairly easily to
the older branches. If not, I don't think it's worth worrying about.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-04 20:36:29 | Re: Does pg_settings.sourcefile/sourceline work on Windows? |
Previous Message | Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC) | 2011-10-04 19:46:18 | Action requested - Application Softblock implemented | Issue report ID341057 |