From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Back-branch releases upcoming this week |
Date: | 2011-09-20 15:03:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxox==OEk=um_gEJpbW=e0yEZxzpQDKowD-bRnVuWZKkE2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> As has been mentioned a couple times, we're well overdue for updates of
>>> the back branches. Seems like time to get that done, so we'll be
>>> wrapping 8.2.x and up this Thursday for release Monday the 26th.
>
>> 8.2 up, including 9.1.1? I'm not sure our QA guys will be able to cope
>> with verification of so many individual installers in that timeframe -
>> 8.2 - 9.0 is hard enough to do in one go.
>
> Well, all the pre-9.1 branches are definitely badly in need of updates.
> 9.1 maybe could go without at this point, but we do have one crasher bug
> and one serious memory leak fixed there, neither new in 9.1. I'd just
> as soon not establish a precedent for not releasing the same fixes at
> the same time in all branches.
>
> How about we wrap them all, but you could let your team slip the 9.1
> update for a day or so if they need more time? It's certainly less
> critical than the older branches.
OK, well we can push the installers much more quickly over the CDN anyway.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-20 15:13:05 | Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-09-20 15:01:51 | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |