Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
>>
>> Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit
>> :
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment -
>> > It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for
>> > compilation there is terrible.
>> >
>>
>> I agree it's hard to compile an extension on Windows, but that's already
>> what we have. And I'm sure EDB will put all interesting contrib modules in
>> their windows installer to help users. They already go way further than any
>> Linux packages.
>
> I afraid so dependency on EDB in this case is wrong - I have respect to EDB
> due work, but installation other extension from EDB stack is difficult,
> unclean, and nothing what I would to use as new base.

The five or six mouse clicks required to install something like Slony
or PostGIS (or both at once) is difficult and unclean?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company