From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "J(dot)F(dot) Oster" <jinfroster(at)mail(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: More search in object's definitions |
Date: | 2014-07-09 11:16:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxowmhKw_0Kq=FsLu5tMzttyPHS0btbJY6yvPv3_ZU_C-9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Thanks - patch applied.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:39 PM, J.F. Oster <jinfroster(at)mail(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This patch adds search capabilities for:
>
> * Column's type names and default values
> * Everything in a view definition
> * Column names in composite types, tables and foreign tables
>
> I'm not sure how far should this feature be developed further. Is it
> enough to cover most typical needs? (with this patch I feel my needs
> almost covered)
> Or should it take a burden of revealing _each_and_every_ usage of
> constants and object dependencies not managed by DBMS? In the latter
> case we'd firstly make up a list of these.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> J.F.
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | J.F. Oster | 2014-07-09 15:08:44 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Support the new check_option parameter of views |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2014-07-09 11:16:46 | pgAdmin III commit: This patch adds search capabilities for: |