From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | David Vaillancourt <david_v(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: PGadmin Schema/DDL VCS plugin ... |
Date: | 2011-12-15 16:05:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxowGGXO-qU=_Wo0FBcw8JtB3D-Ykz+XJa6OdY1dwg-2c-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:43 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, David Vaillancourt
>> <david_v(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the quick feedback. I'm really surprised that people who use VCS
>> > for their 'normal' code, wouldn't see a use for the same when it comes to DB
>> > Schema/DDL versions.
>> > In any case, my goal is not to add the functionality directly to PGAdmin,
>> > but rather create a plugin for PGadmin to use.
>>
>> Yeah, the current plugin architecture really isn't suited to that I
>> doubt - its pretty simplistic. I certainly have objections to that
>> being enhanced though.
>>
>
> Which objections? just to know, because I don't see any reasons to
> object on enhancing the plugin architecture without knowing the proposed
> enhancements.
Sorry - typo. "I certainly don't have objections..."
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Vaillancourt | 2011-12-15 16:18:31 | Re: Fwd: PGadmin Schema/DDL VCS plugin ... |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-12-15 15:58:48 | Re: Fwd: PGadmin Schema/DDL VCS plugin ... |