| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Date: | 2016-05-11 14:25:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxowArKuYLY+j3Niu1E4GVhr9Nck9wN8CsAi0oEYHCNTROQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm wondering whether or not we should be promoting pglogical with the
> release as an external extension.
We have a long standing practice of not promoting external
tools/utilities/add-ons in docs or with releases - as you know we went
out of our way to remove such references from the docs years ago.
This becomes especially problematic when such external
tools/utilities/add-ons have been developed by one particular company,
as Robert pointed out here
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZVBmTnUT419mS3pV9hESJh78gibD_2tviaoGMWvOTwtg@mail.gmail.com
I strongly oppose recommending any non-core 'stuff' in the docs or
press releases/announcements (including pgAdmin 4).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-05-11 14:30:40 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-05-10 21:21:24 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |