| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Somewhat excessive version checks |
| Date: | 2021-01-12 08:56:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxow7rQVSNhfhK_6E4KUX==P9BL2M_N4K7vSddD=nyMDhLA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:06 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I read the code correctly, pgadmin will (unless turned off) hit the
> website to check the version.json file for updates *every time it
> starts*.
>
Every time the server starts, which is a little different, but still...
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to rate limit that to checking say once per 24
> hours maximum? Or even 48?
>
That certainly wouldn't be a bad idea.
>
> It seems nobody needs the update *that* quickly, and AFAICT it does
> call out to make that check synchronously on startup which means the
> user is waiting.
>
> And if/when doing that, it would be useful to include an
> If-Modified-Since header on the request, so the server can just
> respond with a tiny 304 reply when there is no update, which is going
> to be the majority of the time. Or possibly even more efficiently,
> create a custom etag and use If-None-Matches. If you make that etag be
> say the version that the client has, it becomes very cheap to check
> and you don't need to track any extra data.
>
Patches welcome!
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2021-01-12 09:08:39 | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch] - RM 5457 - Kerberos Authentication - Phase 1 |
| Previous Message | Khushboo Vashi | 2021-01-12 06:48:11 | Re: [pgAdmin][RM1802] ERD Tool (Beta) |