From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Landauer <thomas(at)landauer(dot)at>, pgAdmin Support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin 4: "PostgreSQL Binary Path"? |
Date: | 2016-09-07 11:15:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxow77F8ndPxBn8HOdiwPR9mz3Pv1Wrd2R00Hxzt0NeY6ig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Thomas Landauer <thomas(at)landauer(dot)at>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > see attached screenshot - this appears when I click on "details".
>> >
>> > I doubt that the process is really still running. I restarted the
>> computer,
>> > and meanwhile also deleted the mentioned backup-file.
>>
>> OK, I think Ashesh would be be better placed to suggest a next step...
>>
> We generally starts a background process, which will report back the error
> code, stderr, and stdout back to the pgAdmin server as a file.
> I think - you discovered a bug - the background process did not report the
> status code back to pgAdmin server.
>
Presumably there's a status file still on Thomas' machine, as the task
keeps re-displaying. Is it worth looking at that?
>
> I will take a look at it.
>
> Can you please create a RM case for the same?
>
Me? :-)
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Landauer | 2016-09-09 07:43:00 | Re: pgAdmin 4: "PostgreSQL Binary Path"? |
Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2016-09-07 09:32:18 | Re: pgAdmin 4: "PostgreSQL Binary Path"? |