From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
Date: | 2011-07-21 19:29:41 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxow6a4G27isfAigUG7_48kgXkr63KO0LDeXS_5W4KVD8gQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think the real challenge is going to be testing. If anyone has a
>>> machine with weak memory ordering they can give me access to, that
>>> would be really helpful for flushing the bugs out of this stuff.
>>> Getting it to work on x86 is not the hard part.
>>
>> I believe there's a PPC box in our storage facility in NJ that we
>> might be able to dig out for you. There's also a couple in our India
>> office. Let me know if they'd be of help.
>
> Yes!
>
> More processors is better, of course, but having anything at all to
> test on would be an improvement.
OK, will check with India first, as it'll be easier for them to deploy.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-21 19:29:49 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-21 19:25:56 | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |