Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "depesz(at)depesz(dot)com" <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Date: 2011-10-30 09:53:57
Message-ID: CA+OCxow5FTPJoRdsswY436z5U7uFS1QZMe9-ScFwx+KiQ8JmGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

Hi

pgsql-www really isn't the list for this. I'd suggest -general.

On Sunday, October 30, 2011, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
wrote:
> hi,
> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
> datetimes:
> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>
> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions built
> with integer datetimes?
>
> Best regards,
>
> depesz
>
> --
> The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact
with it.
>
http://depesz.com/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Farber 2011-10-30 12:53:53 Re: From select to delete
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2011-10-30 07:31:53 Re: PostgreSQL Naming Rules - another question

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2011-10-30 11:17:06 Re: new git repository request
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2011-10-30 06:24:09 Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?