From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vote Release number of the next. |
Date: | 2013-05-16 07:22:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxow05XTwBzjofDTw-mZyeaFgo4s4AAmbXRPD=f8F5pdjeg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think the vote of the next release number.
>
> 1.) 09.01.0300
> many patch is a bug-fix support. and, psqlODBC is not intended
> to be synchronized with postgres version number.
Yes it is - we used to have some users get confused about what they
should use, so we decided to link the version number to the current
database server version number. There is no technical reason for
linking them.
> 2.) 09.02.0100
> new version is desirable because test code that contains.
>
> 3.) 09.03.0100
> we want to have a postgres release the next number.
>
> ==
> I vote to 1.) , I think the major version up, when there is a
> change of more features and desirable.
> thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2013-05-16 07:22:58 | Re: Vote Release number of the next. |
Previous Message | ljwilson | 2013-05-15 23:36:14 | Re: Vote Release number of the next. |