| From: | Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid |
| Date: | 2017-03-15 13:49:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+N_YAeJi9OixacFUJdOH2TcRhQyD4Ckice64E1yfMNYRHf-vw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Stephen,
Thanks. I understand this is small but new feature and not bug fix.
But we should be able to backpatch if there is no dependency.
It will help users to get benefit of this feature for g96 and pg95 in RDS
until they will have pg10 in RDS.
If It is against community policy then it is ok. I can understand.
Regards,
Sachin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Sachin Kotwal (kotsachin(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > Can we have backpatch this patch to PostgreSQL 9.6 and earlier releases ?
>
> No. This is a new feature and new features are not back-patched.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephen
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Sachin Kotwal
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-15 13:50:08 | Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-03-15 13:19:46 | Re: Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid |