Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: 2022-01-18 06:11:34
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHzyNuEvqPHV6LvMt4oJNvN_+zoh5sR25c5VvwuaVpq7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:41 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 02:33:39PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:16:23PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by
> > > the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the
> > > patch and discussion.
> >
> > This issue is discussed here:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220117203746.oj43254j5jurbneu@alap3.anarazel.de
>
> Oh I missed it, thanks! Sorry for the noise.

Thanks, it had puzzled me too when I first saw it this morning.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 陈佳昕 (步真) 2022-01-18 06:21:14 32TB relation size make mdnblocks overflow
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-01-18 06:05:10 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side